Pondering

Salam.

3/4/17

When u read this article wot reaction do u hav? Possibly I hav learned something about law, wot a check n balance with transparency n accountability system they hav in place, their media is so effective in ensuring all in the sake of public good.

Well yes u probably learn the law the government n media wants u to learn. They want to program yor mind by touching the theme to b promoted upholding the law by its letter but hiding the fact that spirit of any law will b defined "depending on wot ONLY America needs (to fool the world)". 

We r talking about 2 individuals - one president n another president-in-the-making the sitting American presidents dotter. Not only that but a family which net worth is probably in the first 200s in the world of 7 billions n who r doing bizness with 100+ countries. That is no joke statistics to b considered when a nation decides who shud b a mere candidate for the top post in the government not to hue n cry about it later. Just being nominated sorry selected hav they with a turn of a switch lost their appetite to make money? Can any human do that? Don't they know public offices r temporary n wot they had built lifelong is permanent n they will hav to return to manage them? Well they might not b allowed to get involved from day to day supervisions or decision making processes but will they or shud they stop talking to their sons n brothers, husband? Isn't that sufficient natural tendency to continue as a decision maker? Do u c any ex presidents just sitting around n romantasizing their White House days or capitalising on that n becoming if not super rich but lot more bank balance than they had when they left the office. This is the hard reality!  Even the harder reality is a British pm has directly admitted that his prior "shameful" position as pm helps his current employer Goldman Sachs who had recruited this scumbag for exorbitant millions. Conflict of interest for both American n British attorney generals to look at, huh! Shabash! The fairness n transparency of the capitalism. 

U can call such treatment of convenience in defining their laws Hinduism, bcoz they c the creator in all sorts or movable, immovable, conceptual irrational beings. Whereas we the Muslims say which is more true - the object in front of the mirror or the image of the object inside the mirror? It is the object in front of the mirror (imam Ghazali, peace on him).

We know that all of these heads of states visits a country not to mix with general people not even in their own countries or the ct where they lived all their lives. One of my blogs that was hitting this point was snatched away (based on an article where it showed new york ct spent $100+ millions for trump family's. Security). Wherever they go they just attend functions to hobnob with the political n bizness elites, n a few places that pisses off the locals but pleases those that helps their irrational, immatured n uneducated disaster creating foreign policies. Now in these functions of dignitaries can they say an existing bizness partner adios amigo, mucho trobaho but 4 yrs later, n wot if he has been selected for 8 yrs? COME ON AMERICA GET REAL! U r fooling no one but yourselves. Don't think like yor bad pop culture the world will b swallowing yor game of tensions n only g8 likes can manage high net worth individuals to run the country to put it back where it belongs.

Ivanka Trump Tries to Quiet the Ethics Critics - The New Yorker

http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/ivanka-trump-tries-to-quiet-the-ethics-critics